Wednesday, 26 October 2016

The New York Times once again tilts the scales

The NYT continued to show their bias towards Clinton with their article.
The New York Times today published a section in their paper entitled
‘All the People, Places and Things Donald Trump has insulted on Twitter since declaring his candidacy for President’

Where is the insults Clinton has given to those who supported Trump, to Trump himself? Hillary isn’t a clean person, she has insulted, she has offended, it isn’t just Trump. So where is the 6000 words of Hillary’s insults. While, granted, she may not have used as many strong words as Trump, she may not have struck up as many insults, they are there and they shouldn’t be ignored. But I suppose that the media will stand in the way of anyone they don’t approve of, especially Trump, as we have already seen, and as Wikileaks has already highlighted.


How is the media getting away with this so easily? Where is a source of news that isn’t so tainted or biased. Where is the share of news that poses the situations on an even playing field, instead of forcing Trump to fight an uphill battle? This unfairness is so obvious, and so obviously harming Trump.

Friday, 14 October 2016

La Trobe shows how ‘politically correct’ it has become, and how stupid this concept really is

Image result for la trobe university trigger warnings
Trigger Warnings is the name given to an action where you have to warn people about what you are speaking about  if it contains inappropriate or ‘scary’ or ‘hated’ things. The University ‘Student Union’ has passed a motion that means that essentially, the university has been turned into a ‘safe space’. How on earth are people meant to learn about the world, and the controversial issues, if they are constantly being shielded from the issues or topics.

Rita Panahi wrote this:

La Trobe University’s student union passed a motion to use trigger warnings in student council meetings. Its list of issues requiring a trigger warning is extensive, including the usual fare such as eating disorders, rape, suicide and violence, but also includes vomit, snakes, spiders, Islamophobia, needles, slimy things, insects, classism, food, eye contact, misophonia (hatred of sounds), pregnancy, queerphobia, transphobia, transmisogyny, weapons, sex, and any discussion of “isms” including “shaming, or hatred of any kind (racism, classism, hatred of cultures/ethnicities that differ from your own, sexism, hatred of sexualities or genders that differ from your own, anti-multiple, non-vanilla shaming, sex positive shaming, fat shaming/body image shaming, neuroatypical shaming).”
Image result for la trobe university 
However, not all universities s are following La Trobe’s example. The University of Chicago released a statement saying:

“Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so called ‘trigger warnings’, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”...

To sum up the situation at what Andrew Bolt called an ‘anti-intellectualism’ university, Richard Dawkins tweets;
“A university is not a ‘safe space’. If you need a safe space, leave, go home, hug your teddy and suck your thumb until ready for university.”


He really gets to the point. People go to university to learn about the world, and better prepare themselves for properly entering it on their own. If they’re not ready for it, tell them to go back to pre-school. If they are ready for that, that is, because nap-time, in the middle of the day, may offend them.

Vanessa de Largie shows the unfairness of the modern world

In a world where Section 18C can be enforced, you never know what you can say, but this quote by Vanessa de Largie shows that the unfairness of the real world means that some people can say some things more than others can.

Image result for Vanessa de largie
Feminist Vanessa de Largie supposedly speaks for all female
victims of domestic violence, yet she wishes Kardashian was killed.
Yet, I have a confession to make. When I heard the news that Kim Kardashian West had been gagged and robbed at gunpoint in her private Paris apartment last week, my first thought was: Why couldn’t they have killed her?

Can you imagine the outrage and bitterness that would have erupted had Donald Trump said that? The headlines would be all over that quote, yet when this female writer on the women’s section of the Daily Telegraph writes it, it manages to keep itself hidden, as if nothing had ever been said. Had Abbott said this, the Daily Telegraph would have printed pages of the sexism, hate and arrogance that Abbott possessed because of this quote, yet the Daily Telegraph printed this themselves. You have to wonder, who are the editors of the Daily Telegraph, and what are they doing, and further, can this be considered as hate speech? Who really is Vanessa de Largie.


Now, I am not a Kardashian supporter. I had to search up how to spell the name. She is not a person I am particularly familiar with, and I certaintly don’t keep up with the Kardashians. I just don’t know why some people can say some things, but others can’t. Aren’t we meant to live in a world where everything is fair, and just in the world. Had a male commentator said this, they would have been labelled sexist, mysognist, the list goes on, yet this de Largie manages to write this without a scrape. She is probably being patted on the back for her brilliant work, and de Largie is very lucky the affairs of a Kardashian isn’t front-page news.

Someone the media doesn’t want in charge

It has now been found that the media and Clinton were ‘aiding’ each other, for the cause of Clinton. Emails have been leaked showing that the press have been ‘working in her interests’ since the start of the race to candidacy.

Staff at The Boston Globe worked with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign to maximize her “presence” during her primary race against Sen. Bernie Sanders, new emails show...

Another email contains shocking requests that would put Hilary way in front of Sanders. With the media on her side, Hilary could take full control of America, and cut out the sceptics.


Related image
Wikileaks has found that the Boston Times has
been aiding Clinton in her race for the Top Job.
Marjorie Pritchard, the Globe’s op-ed editor, contacted Podesta wondering if the Clinton campaign was still set to submit an op-ed. But then, Pritchard went above and beyond and offered tips about how the campaign could extract maximum benefit from the piece by coordinating its publication to match the Globe’s regular reporting.
“It would be good to get it in on Tuesday, when she is in New Hampshire,” Pritchard says.
“That would give her a big presence on Tuesday with the piece and on Wednesday with the news story. Please let me know.”

Another report shows that Trump really is standing alone fighting the media and going against the current, while Clinton has the easy task of going with the flow. Clinton has a lot to answer for, but even more than that, the American media outlets have a lot to answer for. Some of America’s biggest, and most trusted (trusted, if you are a leftist socialist) newspapers are in on this cahoot which leaves not only Trump, but the American people in the dark.

The chairman of Univision pressured Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign to attack Donald Trump more fiercely on immigration, according to a new report.
Haim Saban reached out to Clinton’s camp last year after Trump said some illegal immigrants from Mexico are “drug dealers” and “rapists” during his campaign launch, The Washington Post said Monday.
“Haim thinks we are under reacting to Trump/Hispanics,” Clinton campaign manager John Podesta allegedly wrote to top campaign aides after speaking with Saban, according to hacked emails recently posted by WikiLeaks. "[He] thinks we can get something by standing up for Latinos or attacking R’s for not condemning."
Image result for new york timesHuma Abedin, the Clinton campaign’s vice chairwoman, said in a separate message Saban had also made similar overtures to her.

“If Haim is raising it, it means he’s hearing it from his Univision colleagues,” she said of Saban, who has given millions to the pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA.

“Haim is right – we should be jamming this all the time,” Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri said in another message, looping in her deputies...
The Washington Post said Saban and his wife have donated $10 million to a pro-Clinton super PAC this year.
Saban on Monday said his support for Clinton does not conflict with his role leading the most watched Spanish-language television network.


Image result for trumpThank goodness for the Wikileaks, and their work in uncovering this scandal. While it may have been obvious to Trump supporters, this release gives proof that the American media has already decided who they want as President, and it doesn’t matter how much Clinton says that Russia wants Trump to be president, because they aren’t in America, and unless an invasion is being planned, they won’t be. Clinton is the one with the advantage. Trump is the one fighting against this lawlessness, and he is doing a darn good job of it. The idea of an independent journalist who analyses both sides is lost to the world, and the public, who are meant to trust the media, is so much the worse of it. The media are just selling to the public their agenda, and who knows, in the future, the CNN may turn into the Clinton News Network?