Tuesday, 19 July 2016

Batting for the wrong side.

Yesterday, Kevin Rudd made the desperate plea to the Australian Government, led by Malcolm Turnbull, for him to be endorsed by Australia for the position of UN Secretary-General, the position that will be campaigned for later this year with the ending of the current secretary late 2016.

The plea was accepted by Foreign Minister Julie Bishop and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull in a manner which most conservatives, the base of the Liberal party, would be disappointed and angered. Andrew Bolt, a hard-core conservative was certainly disappointed that Julie Bishop even seemed to entertain the idea. On Radio 2GB last night, while speaking with Steve Price, he explained his reasons for his disapproval of Kevin Rudd, who has caused so much lasting pain and harm financially for Australia.
The Current UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon
will leave in December 2016

Bolt stated that his main reasons were
-Rudd’s administration was the worst it could possibly be and
-It would mean that the UN would get even more muddled in Australia’s affairs.
Administration is one of the points that the UN should be worried about. Ever since he left parliament in 2013, Kevin Rudd took off for another country, not interested in the affairs of Australia, or about the people of Australia he proclaimed so many times that he was taking care of. Now, after seeing the ramifications of Rudd’s work as Prime Minister, surely the government, who proposes to be serving those of the right-wing of politics, would deny Rudd straight out. Surely there have to be better candidates than the man who knocked over the first domino towards half a million dollars of debt?

The UN is already muddling in Australia’s affairs, crying over minor human rights record inflictions that do not compare to that of other countries. So already, the UN, which has never served a purpose, is wasting its time. This global organisation, which so many leftist countries are in bed with, has not contributed towards any major problem in the world with their knee jerk reaction. The problem with endorsing Rudd is that the man would put his leftist ideas into action with his role as Secretary-General, increasing Foreign Aid amounts and energy goals for the future. He would not serve Australia, but just harm us more.

Image result for kevin rudd united nations
Kevin Rudd has asked
for endorsement by the
Australian Government
A writer for the Australian joined Bolt and Price on 2GB, with a different viewpoint. He stated that Rudd could not do any worse than the current Secretary-General is doing, that the UN is a useless organisation, and that it would make little difference if he was to gain the role or not. He also stated that he was one of the only, if not the only Australian candidate for Australian endorsement, but surely, in this age of political correctness and multiculturalist views, we could expect that this would not be the answer. The columnist ended saying ‘But it doesn’t matter. It isn’t as if it [The UN] is a major organisation’.
This just about sums up the United Nation’s work in the past decade. 

But why would Bishop even entertain the idea when Rudd has not only been harmful to Australia, but vicious to the leader she is so loyal to, Malcolm Turnbull. It has been recalled that during his time as opposition, when ‘valiantly’ fighting against the leftist ideas imposing into society, Rudd whispered loudly enough to reach the media chambers ‘just resign, just resign, just resign’ in a hateful tone. Whether Rudd would admit to such weak attack, is unclear, but why should the Liberal Government entertain the idea of supporting a socialist like Rudd.


The Liberal party, headed by the socialist’s in the party, need to stop batting for the wrong side, and start putting Australia back on the track to economic management and stability.